Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable protocol with concrete tool calls, a runnable Spec example, and a clear sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints. It is held just below top marks by minor placeholder gaps, the absence of an explicit retry loop, and a referenced example file that is not bundled.
Suggestions
Add an explicit 'if research_validate returns INVALID → fix the Spec → re-validate' retry loop in 标准流程 to close the workflow feedback-loop gap.
Fill the placeholder '...' values in the minimal Spec example (case input/expected) so the JSON is fully copy-paste-runnable.
Provide the actual invocation shape for the research_* tools (arguments/flags) rather than only naming them, or ship the referenced examples/llm-replacement.md so the signaled reference resolves.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence (no concept tutorials), with every section earning its place; minor redundancy between the 触发门禁 section and the frontmatter description keeps it just below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete tool calls (research_validate, research_create, research_inspect, research_execute, research_continue, research_compare, research_evidence), a copy-pasteable JSON Spec, and a Decision enum; minor gaps remain (placeholder '...' fields, no full command invocation syntax). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | 标准流程 gives a clear 7-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (执行前检查 with research_inspect, returning structured gaps) and error-recovery enums (UNSUPPORTED/INVALID/INCONCLUSIVE), but lacks an explicit 'validate → fix → re-validate' retry loop, so it sits just under anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections with content appropriately inline and a single clearly signaled one-level reference ('examples/llm-replacement.md'); the referenced file is not present in the bundle, a minor organization gap versus anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |