CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

feishu-create-doc

创建飞书云文档。从 Lark-flavored Markdown 内容创建新的飞书云文档,支持指定创建位置(文件夹/知识库/知识空间)。

51

Quality

57%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./资料/feishu-openclaw-plugin/package/skills/feishu-create-doc/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with comprehensive, copy-paste-ready examples for the Feishu-specific format, but it is a long monolithic document that re-explains basic Markdown and would benefit from splitting the format reference into a bundled file. The long-document creation workflow also lacks explicit sequencing and validation steps.

Suggestions

Move the large "内容格式" Lark-flavored Markdown reference into a bundled references/ file and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview with a clearly signaled link.

Trim re-explanations of standard Markdown basics (headings, bold, lists) that Claude already knows.

Add an explicit step-by-step sequence with validation checkpoints for the long-document append-mode creation workflow.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is a ~700-line reference that is mostly justified (Lark-flavored Markdown extensions are Feishu-specific), but it also re-explains standard Markdown basics (headings, bold, lists) Claude already knows and could be tightened or offloaded to a reference file.

2 / 3

Actionability

Every block type ships concrete, copy-paste-ready XML/tag examples with full attribute lists and several complete parameter examples (e.g. the lark-table and callout snippets), giving fully executable guidance.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The basic single-call action and parameter priority ("wiki_node > wiki_space > folder_token") are clear, but the multi-step long-doc guidance ("强烈建议配合update-doc中的append mode, 进行分段的创建") is mentioned without an explicit sequence or validation checkpoints.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well-organized with clear headings, but no bundle files exist and the entire Lark-flavored Markdown format reference is inline in a single monolithic SKILL.md rather than split into a one-level-deep reference file.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

50%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description states a clear, specific capability but stops short of providing explicit "when to use" trigger guidance or distinguishing triggers from sibling Feishu document skills. It is competent but incomplete by this rubric's standards.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. "Use when the user asks to create or新建 a Feishu/Lark document (docx) from Markdown content."

Clarify the relationship to sibling skills (e.g. update-doc) so it is obvious when this skill fires versus others.

Include more natural user phrasings ("飞书文档", "新建文档", "Lark doc") to broaden trigger term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names a concrete action ("创建飞书云文档") and a capability ("支持指定创建位置(文件夹/知识库/知识空间)"), but the action set is narrow — essentially one verb (create) rather than multiple specific concrete actions.

2 / 3

Completeness

It clearly answers "what" (create Feishu docs from Lark-flavored Markdown at a specified location) but provides no "when/Use when..." guidance, which per the rubric caps completeness at 2.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Natural domain terms like "飞书云文档", "Markdown", "知识库/知识空间" are present, but common variations a user might say (e.g. "飞书文档", "新建文档", "Lark doc") are missing and there is no natural trigger phrasing.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The Feishu-doc niche is fairly specific, but "创建飞书云文档" could overlap with sibling Feishu doc skills (e.g. update-doc) and lacks triggers that disambiguate which skill fires.

2 / 3

Total

8

/

12

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

skill_md_line_count

SKILL.md is long (720 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 1 missing

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
op7418/CodePilot
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.