Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is dense, actionable, and well-structured: it pairs an intent-to-tool index with concrete parameter formats, sequenced scenario walkthroughs, and a troubleshooting table. It respects Claude's intelligence (no concept padding) and gives copy-paste-ready examples. Main room for improvement is tightening a few prose passages and, optionally, splitting the larger reference tables into a referenced file.
Suggestions
Tighten the prose in section 1 (time-range inference) and section 3 into terser rules so the body stays table/pointer-driven throughout.
Consider moving the detailed resource-marker and search-parameter tables into a referenced reference file, keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview with one-level-deep pointers.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint after fetch_resource and after multi-page retrieval (e.g., 'confirm result count matches expectation before reporting to user') to elevate workflow_clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean and table-driven with no padding about what Feishu/IM is; a few prose passages (e.g., section 1's inference guidance) could be tightened but every section earns its place. Not a 5 because section intros are slightly more explanatory than strictly necessary. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully concrete: names exact tools, parameter formats (oc_xxx, omt_xxx, file_key img_xxx/file_xxx, type values), and copy-paste-ready JSON examples with realistic field shapes covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequencing via '执行前必读', an intent→tool index, step-numbered scenarios, and a '常见错误与排查' error-recovery table. The pagination loop (has_more/page_token) acts as a checkpoint; minor gap is the absence of an explicit post-fetch validation step, so not a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single-file skill with no bundle files, well-organized into clearly headed sections and tables with a quick-index for navigation. Good structure; scored 4 rather than 5 because it exceeds the 'under 50 lines' simple-skill exception and a couple of dense reference tables could conceptually live in a separate reference file, though inlining is reasonable for this scope. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |