Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, executable reference for the paper-search CLI with concrete commands, sensible defaults, and a clear workflow. The only gap is the absence of an explicit error/validation checkpoint in the workflow, which is minor for a read-only skill.
Suggestions
Add a brief note in the Workflow on handling failures (e.g., what to do if `download` or `read` returns no text, or how to retry with a different source) to add an explicit validation checkpoint.
Clarify how `paper_id` is obtained from search results before using it in `download`/`read`, since the workflow jumps from search to download without stating where the id comes from.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient: flags, defaults, and copy-paste commands with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable commands for search, download, read, and sources subcommands with concrete flags, defaults, and argument placeholders covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step numbered workflow (search, present, read, download) with a minor gap: no explicit validation/error-handling checkpoint, though the skill is non-destructive so the destructive cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A compact, well-organized skill with clear section headers and no need for external references; meets the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure via well-structured sections. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |