CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

babysit-pr

Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep watching open PRs so fresh review feedback is surfaced promptly. Use when the user asks Codex to monitor a PR, watch CI, handle review comments, or keep an eye on failures and feedback on an open PR.

79

1.72x
Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

95%

1.72x

Average score across 2 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.codex/skills/babysit-pr/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Low

Low-risk findings.

1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.

Low

W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).

What this means

The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.

Why it was flagged

The watcher ingests outsider-authored free text from GitHub PR issue comments, inline review comments, and review bodies via `gh api .../issues/<pr>/comments`, `.../pulls/<pr>/comments`, and `.../pulls/<pr>/reviews`, then includes their `body` fields in the JSON snapshots (`new_review_items`) that the agent reads into LLM context.

Report incorrect finding
Repository
openai/codex
Audited
Security analysis
Snyk

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.