Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable skill body: concrete verified commands, clear task routing, and documented failure handling with almost no padding. Remaining improvements are minor — removing one redundant line and adding an explicit post-install verification step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, but has minor trimmable redundancy: the standalone line "Install skills with the helper scripts." duplicates the bullet list above it, and the intro bullets overlap the Scripts section. This fits 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed' rather than the fully lean 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: exact commands with flags and concrete examples for each case (e.g., `scripts/list-skills.py --path skills/.experimental`, `scripts/install-skill-from-github.py --repo <owner>/<repo> --path <path>`), and the referenced scripts exist with matching argument surfaces, covering the common cases copy-paste ready. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Task routing (list vs. curated install vs. repo install) is unambiguous and failure behavior is documented (auth errors fall back to git sparse checkout, abort if destination exists, explain and exit if listing unavailable). The gap is the absence of an explicit post-install verification step, which keeps it at 'clear sequence with most checkpoints' rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At ~50 lines with well-organized sections and no external reference files needed, the skill meets the simple-skill guideline for a top score; its script references are real, one level deep, and correctly flag-matched against the actual bundle. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |