Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, token-efficient overview that gives concrete decision guidance, a sequenced workflow with a validation checkpoint, and properly signals one-level-deep reference files. It avoids concept padding and monolithic structure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: no padding about what SwiftUI or AppKit are, just tight bullets and decision rules where every line earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Although it is instruction-only with no code, the per-bridge-type decision rules and ownership boundary guidance are concrete and actionable, which the rubric's instruction-only carve-out rewards rather than penalizes. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (name gap, pick boundary, keep ownership, expose interface, validate lifecycle) with an explicit validation checkpoint in step 5 (SwiftUI may recreate representables; coordinators are glue, not architecture). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise overview with four clearly-signaled one-level-deep references, each annotated with its scope and verified to be real files in ./references/, matching the well-structured reference example. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |