Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, lean analysis skill with a sequenced workflow, explicit validation and feedback loops, and clean progressive disclosure into verified bundle files. The only minor gap is limited copy-paste code beyond the validation command.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and information-rich with no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows (no 'what is a patch/PR/diff'); every step and rule earns its tokens. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete executable validation command (with stdin variant), a referenced JSON schema, and concrete recommendation/workflow labels; stops short of copy-paste code covering common cases beyond validation, fitting the 'mostly executable; minor gaps' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 10-step workflow with an explicit validation checkpoint (validate JSON before returning), a feedback loop for error recovery, a bounded hold_for_evidence plan, and a Hard Rules checklist. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references (references/risk-rubric.md and the validation script, both verified to exist), with detailed content appropriately split into those bundle files. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |