Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and highly actionable with appropriate progressive disclosure into real reference files. Its main weakness is mild redundancy across the workflow and checklists, and verification checkpoints that read as considerations rather than explicit gates.
Suggestions
Consolidate the counterevidence guidance that currently repeats across Workflow step 4, the Scope and Attack Path Checklist, and the Counterevidence Checklist into a single authoritative section.
Reframe the 'Before finalizing...' and counterevidence items as explicit validation gates (e.g., 'Stop and verify counterevidence is recorded before finalizing scope') to make checkpoints unambiguous for the batch/multi-candidate flow.
Tighten the overlap between the Workflow service-mapping step (3) and the Scope and Attack Path Checklist, which describe the same service/exposure/identity fields twice.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean with no concept tutorials, but counterevidence and scope/service-mapping guidance recurs across the Workflow, Scope Checklist, and Counterevidence Checklist, so it could be tightened by deduplication. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only skill it gives concrete, specific guidance: named fact fields, exact required receipt contents (candidate id, decision, facts/proof gap, artifact reference), a precise output contract, and clearly signaled reference files. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 9-step sequenced workflow with checklists exists, but verification checkpoints are stated as considerations rather than hard validate-gates and overlapping checklists slightly muddy the sequence for a batch/multi-candidate operation. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is organized into well-labeled sections with two real one-level-deep local references (severity-policy.md, attack-path-facts.md) clearly signaled, and the heavy severity policy appropriately lives in a separate file rather than inline. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |