Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, highly actionable reference with complete executable code and a clean one-level-deep progressive disclosure structure backed by real reference files. Its main weaknesses are repeated safe-area guidance and a Running-the-App workflow that lacks explicit validation checkpoints.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated contentInsetAdjustmentBehavior / safe-area guidance into a single section to remove redundancy and tighten token use.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint to the 'Running the App' workflow, e.g. 'Verify the feature works in Expo Go before deciding a custom build is required'.
Trim explanatory prose in the 'Running the App' section (e.g. the sentence on custom-build complexity) down to directive bullets.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly terse imperative bullets that assume Claude's competence ('expo-audio not expo-av', 'process.env.EXPO_OS not Platform.OS'), but it repeats safe-area/contentInsetAdjustmentBehavior guidance across sections and includes some explanatory prose in the 'Running the App' section, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides complete, import-included executable code examples (Link, Stack.Screen, NativeTabs layouts, form sheets, context menus) plus concrete library and style directives, matching 'fully executable code/commands; copy-paste ready'. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Running the App' steps are clearly sequenced (start with Expo Go, check features, custom build only when required), but there is no explicit validation or feedback checkpoint, fitting 'sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit'. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A well-signaled References section lists all 14 real one-level-deep reference files with one-line descriptions, and the body appropriately delegates detail to them (verified references/route-structure.md exists), matching 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references'. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |