CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

canva-brand-check

Check a Canva design against a brand kit and report where it diverges — off-palette colors, non-brand fonts, logo misuse, and off-tone copy. Read-only; makes no changes. Use when the user asks "is this on brand", "check this against our brand kit", "do a brand review", "does this match our brand guidelines", or "brand-check my design".

73

Quality

90%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable read-only workflow that surfaces genuinely non-obvious knowledge (the brand-kit data gap and transaction color/font limitations) with clear safety checkpoints. Slightly verbose from restating the data gap and lacks file-level progressive disclosure, but strong overall.

Suggestions

Consolidate the 'brand-kit data gap' and 'reading the design's colors and fonts' sections so the data-availability caveat is stated once rather than re-explained.

If canva-design-feedback and canva-edit-design are real sibling skills, link them as one-level-deep references (e.g. [canva-edit-design](../canva-edit-design/SKILL.md)) rather than name-only mentions to improve navigation.

Move the report template into a references/ file (e.g. REPORT_TEMPLATE.md) and link to it, reducing the inline body length and improving progressive disclosure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Largely lean and assumes Claude's competence (no padding about what a brand kit or Canva is), but the data-gap point is revisited across two sections, introducing minor repetition that could be tightened.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete tool calls (Canva:list-brand-kits, get-design-thumbnail, the read-only transaction sequence) and a copy-ready report template with specific check dimensions; minor gaps in that companion-skill references are name-only.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear 6-step sequence with an explicit safety checkpoint ('always cancel-editing-transaction after inspecting') and error-recovery guidance (missing scopes → reconnect the connector; 'Can't verify' fallback when data is absent).

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clear sections and self-contained with no bundle files, but it is slightly over the simple-skill line (~75 lines) and references companion skills by name rather than as one-level-deep file links.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that concisely states the capability, its read-only boundary, and a rich set of natural trigger phrases. It clearly answers both 'what' and 'when' with minimal fluff.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'report where it diverges — off-palette colors, non-brand fonts, logo misuse, and off-tone copy' plus 'Read-only; makes no changes' — with comprehensive coverage of the check dimensions.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (check a Canva design against a brand kit and report divergences) and when (a clear 'Use when...' clause with concrete trigger phrases).

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes several natural phrases a user would actually say ('is this on brand', 'check this against our brand kit', 'do a brand review', 'does this match our brand guidelines', 'brand-check my design') covering synonyms and variations.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a clear niche — Canva brand-kit checking — with distinct, brand-specific triggers and minimal overlap risk with generic design skills.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
openai/plugins
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.