Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable body: concrete API calls, a sequenced workflow with an explicit cancel-transaction safety checkpoint, and a worked feedback template. Only minor conciseness drift from restating the read-only boundary.
Suggestions
Trim the restatement of the read-only boundary in the body intro since it is already covered in the frontmatter description and the Rules section.
Consider listing the 'CANNOT' items the API can't touch inline (or a brief summary) rather than only deferring to canva-edit-design, so the offer-to-act step stands alone.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and efficient, with the non-obvious API capability/gap section earning its tokens; the read-only boundary and hand-off note restate the frontmatter description, a small amount of over-explanation that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete named API calls, explicit resolution logic (short link vs. full URL vs. raw D-ID), and a copy-pasteable feedback output template with severities and located fixes covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced steps with an explicit validation checkpoint for the fragile read-only transaction (always cancel, never commit), reinforced by a Rules section safety loop. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained skill with clean section headers, no nested references, and easy navigation; it points to a sibling skill for the CANNOT list rather than duplicating it, an appropriate one-level reference. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |