Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, tool-specific workflow that is safe by design (copy-first, transaction-based, approval-gated commit) with clear steps and good use of exact MCP tool names. Main improvements: drop or compress the redundant example section, show a concrete operations payload, and add guidance for error cases such as failed or ambiguous matches.
Suggestions
Remove or drastically compress the 'Example Interaction' section — it restates all six workflow steps verbatim; a one-line pointer to the workflow would preserve the value at a fraction of the tokens.
Include a concrete example of the Canva:perform-editing-operations call with a replace_text operation (element_id and translated text) so the batching instruction is copy-paste actionable.
Add brief error-handling guidance for the batch step: what to do if a replace_text operation fails, if search returns multiple/zero matches (partially covered for multiple matches), and how to abort via abandoning the transaction instead of committing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and tool-focused with no concept explanations Claude already knows, but the 'Example Interaction' section recapitulates all six workflow steps already detailed above — duplication that could be trimmed to fit the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance names the exact tools (Canva:search-designs, Canva:resize-design, Canva:start-editing-transaction, Canva:perform-editing-operations with replace_text, Canva:commit-editing-transaction), the URL format, and the ID prefix convention, which is mostly executable; minor gaps remain, such as no example of a perform-editing-operations payload. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step sequence is clear and includes a real checkpoint (show the preview thumbnail, get explicit approval, then commit) so the batch-operation cap does not apply; however, there is no error-recovery loop for cases like a failed replacement or an ambiguous design match, keeping it below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a compact single-purpose skill with no bundle files present; the sections are well-organized, nothing that belongs in a separate file is inlined, and no external references are needed — matching the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |