Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured overview that points to one real script and gives an executable example plus clear I/O contracts. Its main weaknesses are mild action-list duplication and a single example covering only the search case.
Suggestions
Show one short executable example for a vcv/rcv/scv/refsnp lookup in addition to the search example so all common cases are demonstrated.
De-duplicate the action enumeration: list action→endpoint mapping once and reference it from Input/Output instead of restating it.
Make the failure/retry loop explicit (e.g., on ok=false, inspect error.code, then re-run) rather than only hinting at re-runs.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence with no conceptual padding, but the action-type list (search/vcv/rcv/scv/refsnp) is restated across Execution behavior, Input, and Output sections, a minor redundancy that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete, copy-pasteable bash example and explicit input/output field specs, but only the search action is demonstrated; vcv/rcv/scv/refsnp invocations are described but not shown, leaving a gap versus covering all common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single-action flow (parse action + required fields, execute, return summary or save raw, failures return ok=false) is unambiguous for this read-only skill, though an explicit validate/retry loop is only hinted via 'Re-run requests' rather than spelled out. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections (Operating rules, Execution behavior, Input, Output, Execution, References) and a single one-level-deep, real bundle reference (scripts/clinvar_variation.py, confirmed present); the References section explicitly states no further files are needed. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |