Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-organized operational spec: lean sections, an executable example, exact input/output field lists, and a real referenced script. It scores the maximum on every dimension and appropriately needs no external reference files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~40-line body is lean and operational — operating rules, input/output field specs, and a runnable example — with no padding explaining concepts Claude already knows (the '...' truncation note is operational guidance, not tutorial prose). Every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides a copy-paste-ready executable command ('echo '{"action":"search","terms":"VCV000013080","max_items":10}' | python scripts/clinvar_variation.py') plus exact required/optional input fields and output shapes. This matches the fully-executable, copy-paste-ready anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Per the rubric's simple-skills note, a single-task sub-50-line skill scores 3 when its action is unambiguous; here running the script with an 'action' is unambiguous and read-only (no destructive/batch ops), so the feedback-loop cap does not apply. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Per the simple-skills note, a sub-50-line skill needing no external references scores 3 with well-organized sections; sections are clear and the one referenced path ('scripts/clinvar_variation.py') is a real, present file with no nested or missing references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |