Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable and clearly sequenced into a six-step process with concrete specs, but it carries some explanatory padding, lacks validation checkpoints for its batch operations, and keeps detailed reference material inline rather than splitting it into bundle files.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation checkpoints after batch data gathering (e.g. confirm every peer returned financials) and after workbook generation (e.g. open/verify the .xlsx), with a fix-and-retry loop, to raise workflow clarity.
Move the 9-sector KPI taxonomy and/or the 8-tab layout spec into a reference file (e.g. references/tabs.md) and point to it, improving progressive disclosure.
Trim explanatory filler ("the kind of comp sheet every analyst...", "This lets the reader see...") and assume Claude's knowledge of standard valuation formulas to improve conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly task-relevant with concrete specs, but includes unnecessary explanatory filler such as "the kind of comp sheet every analyst on a coverage team maintains" and "This lets the reader see whether the current multiple is elevated or depressed", so it could be tightened past the score-2 anchor toward score 3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance throughout: exact API calls ("discover_companies", "get_stock_prices"), explicit formulas (Market Cap = Close price x Diluted shares), defined tab layouts, styling hex codes, and a precise output path ("reports/{TARGET_TICKER}_comp_sheet_{DATE}.xlsx"), matching the fully-actionable anchor for an instruction skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The six numbered steps form a clear sequence, but the batch operations (pulling data for ALL companies, generating an 8-tab workbook) have no explicit validation or verification checkpoints or error-recovery loops, which per the judging guidelines caps workflow clarity at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | External references to ../data-access.md and ../design-system.md are well signaled and one level deep, but no local bundle files exist and large reference-like content (the 9-sector KPI taxonomy and the 8-tab definitions) is kept inline rather than split out, matching the score-2 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |