CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

dcf

Discounted cash flow valuation with sensitivity analysis

48

Quality

51%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/daloopa/skills/dcf/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

62%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a well-sequenced, action-oriented DCF procedure with strong validation checkpoints and clear external references. Its main weaknesses are an inline HTML scaffold and KPI catalog that inflate length, and computational steps framed as instructions rather than executable code.

Suggestions

Move the full HTML report scaffold into a bundled template file (e.g. references/report_template.html) and reference it, to improve conciseness and progressive disclosure.

Provide executable snippets for the numerical steps (WACC, terminal value, valuation bridge) instead of prose formulas so the guidance is copy-paste ready.

Relocate the sector KPI taxonomy to a references file and keep only a pointer in SKILL.md to reduce inline bulk.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient and procedural, but the large inline HTML report scaffold (the fenced template block) plus sector-by-sector KPI taxonomy listings add length that could be trimmed; it assumes Claude's competence but retains some content that earns its place only partially.

2 / 3

Actionability

Guidance is concrete and specific (named fields, CAPM formula, citation format) but key computational steps are left as instruction rather than executable code, and the HTML template is a scaffold rather than a copy-paste-ready complete example, matching 'some concrete guidance but incomplete'.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Steps are clearly numbered and sequenced (1-11) with explicit validation/sanity checkpoints in Section 10 (extreme price flags, terminal-value concentration, WACC bounds) and a self-challenge loop, satisfying the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps' anchor.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

References to ../data-access.md and ../design-system.md are clearly signaled and one-level-deep, but there are no local bundle directories (references/scripts/assets) and the bulk of the report template and KPI taxonomy live inline rather than being split out, fitting 'some structure but could be better organized'.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

40%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description identifies a clear domain (DCF valuation) and a couple of actions but lacks the explicit 'Use when...' trigger guidance that the rubric requires for a top score. It reads as a third-person capability statement yet stops short of listing multiple concrete actions or natural trigger terms.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when the user asks for a DCF or intrinsic-value valuation, a discounted cash flow model, or wants to stress-test valuation assumptions.'

List more concrete actions to lift specificity, e.g. '...builds a DCF model, calculates WACC, projects free cash flow, runs sensitivity tables, and saves an HTML report.'

Include common user-facing synonyms like 'DCF', 'intrinsic value', and 'WACC / discount rate' to improve trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

'Discounted cash flow valuation with sensitivity analysis' names the domain and a couple of actions (valuation, sensitivity analysis) but does not list multiple concrete actions like company lookup, WACC build, or report generation, matching the 'names domain and some actions, but not comprehensive' anchor.

2 / 3

Completeness

It states what the skill does (DCF valuation with sensitivity analysis) but provides no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which per the judging guidelines caps completeness at 2.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The only natural user-facing keyword is 'discounted cash flow'; common variations a user would actually say (DCF, valuation, intrinsic value, sensitivity analysis triggers) are absent, leaving thin coverage that leans on technical phrasing.

1 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Discounted cash flow valuation' is a reasonably specific niche, but without explicit triggers it could still overlap with other finance/valuation skills, fitting 'somewhat specific but could still overlap'.

2 / 3

Total

7

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
openai/plugins
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.