Content
62%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-sequenced, action-oriented DCF procedure with strong validation checkpoints and clear external references. Its main weaknesses are an inline HTML scaffold and KPI catalog that inflate length, and computational steps framed as instructions rather than executable code.
Suggestions
Move the full HTML report scaffold into a bundled template file (e.g. references/report_template.html) and reference it, to improve conciseness and progressive disclosure.
Provide executable snippets for the numerical steps (WACC, terminal value, valuation bridge) instead of prose formulas so the guidance is copy-paste ready.
Relocate the sector KPI taxonomy to a references file and keep only a pointer in SKILL.md to reduce inline bulk.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and procedural, but the large inline HTML report scaffold (the fenced template block) plus sector-by-sector KPI taxonomy listings add length that could be trimmed; it assumes Claude's competence but retains some content that earns its place only partially. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and specific (named fields, CAPM formula, citation format) but key computational steps are left as instruction rather than executable code, and the HTML template is a scaffold rather than a copy-paste-ready complete example, matching 'some concrete guidance but incomplete'. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly numbered and sequenced (1-11) with explicit validation/sanity checkpoints in Section 10 (extreme price flags, terminal-value concentration, WACC bounds) and a self-challenge loop, satisfying the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References to ../data-access.md and ../design-system.md are clearly signaled and one-level-deep, but there are no local bundle directories (references/scripts/assets) and the bulk of the report template and KPI taxonomy live inline rather than being split out, fitting 'some structure but could be better organized'. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |