Conciseness

The body is command-first and mostly lean ("python3 -m dynamo.frontend --router-mode round-robin --http-port 8000"), but the Purpose section ("Make Dynamo routing feel easy... Keep the user focused on exact commands, not router internals") is mission-statement padding, and the run_script() invocation is demonstrated three times. Efficient with minor trimmable instances — anchor 4, not 5, because not every token earns its place.

Actionability

Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands cover the common cases: local frontend bring-up, Kubernetes env patches as concrete YAML, kubectl port-forward with real service names, and the smoke-test script invocation with exact arguments. This matches anchor 5; anchor 4 would imply minor gaps, and none are apparent.

Workflow Clarity

The four numbered steps (baseline → KV routing → smoke test → careful comparison) are clearly sequenced with an explicit validation checkpoint ("This must verify /v1/models and, when a model is discoverable, one /v1/chat/completions request") and feedback loops for error recovery (the Troubleshooting symptom→cause→next-step table and the escalation rule to dynamo-troubleshoot). Anchor 5 fits; anchor 4 would require missing checkpoints, which are present.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a good overview that correctly offloads the mode/env map to the real file references/router-modes.md and documents the real script scripts/check_router_health.py, both one level deep and well signaled. It is not anchor 5 because the body cites "See BENCHMARK.md for the NVCARPS-EVAL performance report", a file that does not exist in the bundle, and the inline env YAML partially duplicates the reference's KV-knobs table.

Specificity

"Start or patch Dynamo router modes and run router endpoint smoke checks" lists several concrete, specific actions (start, patch, smoke-check) tied to a named system. It falls short of anchor 5 only because coverage has minor gaps — what gets patched and the mode-comparison workflow are not stated.

Completeness

The what is explicit ("Start or patch Dynamo router modes and run router endpoint smoke checks") and the when is explicit with concrete trigger phrases ("Use for round-robin, KV-aware, least-loaded, or device-aware routing setup"). This clearly matches anchor 5; it is not anchor 4 because the when-clause is fully explicit, not merely present.

Trigger Term Quality

"round-robin", "KV-aware", "least-loaded", "device-aware routing", and "smoke checks" are natural phrases a user would say when needing this skill. A few natural variations (e.g., "router bring-up", "port-forward", "endpoint check") are absent, matching anchor 4 rather than comprehensive anchor 5.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Dynamo" plus named routing modes carve a clear niche, and the description actively reduces conflict risk by routing adjacent tasks elsewhere ("use recipe-runner for recipe deployment and troubleshoot for failure diagnosis"). Minimal overlap risk, matching anchor 5.