Conciseness

The bulk is high-value, non-inferable operational detail, but there is real duplication: the componentization paragraphs ("Componentization is part of the **default** workflow, not an optional follow-up... do not emit a flat tree of one-off frames") are restated nearly verbatim from references/componentization.md, the Parallel Workflow section repeats the fileKey/create_new_file guidance already given in Prerequisites, and Best Practices recaps five rules already stated in Steps 2–5. This matches the 3 anchor (mostly efficient, some unnecessary content that could be tightened) better than the 4 anchor, whose over-explanation is only minor.

Actionability

Nearly every step ships copy-paste-ready executable code with clearly marked placeholders: the Code Connect key resolver ("figma.getNodeByIdAsync('609:35535')... return { componentKey: set.key }"), the wrapper sizing script, the Promise.all section-build script, the SVG icon import ("figma.createNodeFromSvg('<svg width="24" height="24" viewBox=...>')"), and the imageHash transfer loop. Query strategies give concrete term lists ("gray", "background", "space", "radius"). This is fully executable and covers the common cases per the 5 anchor.

Workflow Clarity

The workflow is an explicitly ordered 6-step sequence ("Follow these steps in order. Do not skip steps.") with hard gates forbidding shortcuts, per-section validation via get_screenshot ("Look closely for cropped/clipped text... and overlapping elements"), a mandatory font assertion in Step 5, and a full error-recovery feedback loop (STOP → read error → inspect state → fix script → retry, with an atomicity guarantee). This matches the 5 anchor's explicit validation steps, feedback loops, and checklists.

Progressive Disclosure

Structure is good: a well-signaled "Reference Docs" section with one-line descriptions per file, and local references (references/componentization.md, references/discover-product-font.md) that exist and are one level deep. However, most reference links point outside the bundle (../figma-use/references/component-patterns.md, variable-patterns.md, text-style-patterns.md, effect-style-patterns.md, gotchas.md, ../figma-generate-library/references/component-creation.md) — paths that do not resolve within this skill's directory — and detailed material like the full icon/SVG subsection is inlined rather than split out. That places it at the 4 anchor (good structure, minor organization gaps) rather than 5.

Specificity

The description lays out the full concrete pipeline: "Discovers design system components, variables, and styles from Code Connect files, existing screens, and library search, then imports them and assembles views incrementally section-by-section using design system tokens instead of hardcoded values" — discovery, import, and assembly are all specific actions with named sources. It matches the 5 anchor (multiple specific concrete actions, comprehensive coverage) rather than 4, since no step of the capability is left unspecified.

Completeness

Both halves are explicit: what it does ("Discovers... imports them and assembles views incrementally section-by-section using design system tokens") and when to use it ("This is the preferred workflow skill whenever the user wants to build or update a full page, modal, dialog, drawer, sidebar, panel, or any composed multi-section view in Figma"). It matches the 5 anchor's what-plus-concrete-trigger-phrases pattern exactly; the 4 anchor requires a 'when' that is only partly explicit, which is not the case here.

Trigger Term Quality

It lists eight natural user phrases — "write to Figma", "push page to Figma", "build a landing page in Figma", "convert this modal/dialog/drawer/panel to Figma" — plus synonyms ("app/page", "create in Figma from code", "update the Figma screen to match code"). This is comprehensive natural-term coverage per the 5 anchor; a 4 would be missing common variations, and none are obviously absent.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is distinct — composed multi-section views from design system instances, explicitly framed as "alongside figma-use" and oriented to "build or update a full page, modal, dialog, drawer, sidebar, panel" — but triggers like "create a screen" and "build a landing page in Figma" could plausibly match sibling Figma skills in the same family. It sits between the 4 anchor (mostly distinct, minor overlap with closely related skills) and the 5 anchor; the family overlap keeps it at 4.