Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, domain-specific skill: executable inspection scripts, a clear two-phase workflow with validation and feedback loops, and clean one-level-deep reference navigation. Its only real weakness is verbose persuasive prose in the design-thinking and speaker-notes sections that pads token budget without adding executable value.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The technical core is dense and non-obvious (appendChild-before-xy offset bug, opaque node types, get_metadata/createPage failures) and assumes Claude's competence, but the design-philosophy and speaker-notes sections carry persuasive prose ('a deck with a clear perspective always reads better') that could be tightened, so it is mostly efficient with some unnecessary explanation. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready scripts (getSlideGrid listing, findAllWithCriteria text extraction with font loading, SLIDE_GRID rename) plus concrete error signatures and fix patterns, and the instruction-only design guidance is specific and actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The two-phase deck-building workflow has an explicit numbered sequence (plan then build), batch sizing rules, and explicit validation checkpoints with a feedback loop ('If it fails, screenshot the affected slides and fix before continuing'; 'Only re-plan if a batch fails'). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that points via well-signaled one-level-deep links (including anchored links) to six real, existing reference files, each described in one line under 'Load only the references your task needs', with detail appropriately split out. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |