Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, well-organized router skill: concise, actionable, with a clear workflow and appropriate reference pointers. Its main limitation is that, as a routing skill, its guidance is directional and its references are not rendered as navigable links.
Suggestions
Render reference and specialist-skill paths as markdown links so navigation is clickable.
Add one explicit checkpoint in the workflow (e.g., 'confirm the stack choice with the user before routing') to strengthen validation sequencing.
For each routing target, add a one-line concrete next action so the guidance reads as executable rather than purely directional.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and well-sectioned with no concept explanations Claude already knows (it never explains what Phaser or Three.js are); every section earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete routing targets with exact specialist skill paths and per-track decision guidance, but as an instruction-only router it is directional rather than copy-paste executable, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Default Workflow and Routing Rules give a clear, ordered sequence (classify, pick track, route, plan) with a soft classify-before-code checkpoint; no destructive/batch operations are involved so no validation cap applies, though explicit checkpoints are light. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that points out to eight one-level-deep reference files plus specialist skills in a dedicated References section, with good structure; references are plain relative paths rather than navigable markdown links, a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |