Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-organized body with clear sequencing and good section structure. It would reach top marks on actionability and workflow clarity by adding a sample action invocation and an explicit verify/confirm checkpoint.
Suggestions
Add one concrete example of calling `read_event`/`search_events` and a short sample prep-brief output so the guidance is copy-paste ready and fully actionable.
Insert an explicit checkpoint in the workflow, e.g. 'Confirm the event has attendees/attachments before deciding what to surface,' to lift workflow clarity to the top anchor.
Optionally note how to handle a missing or access-restricted event as a feedback loop, which would strengthen the sequence for edge cases.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean (~25 lines) with no concept explanations or padding; each line assumes Claude's competence and earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete action names with clear conditions are present ('Use `read_event` or `read_event_all_fields` for the focal meeting', 'Use `search_events` when recurrence history...'), but there are no example invocations or a sample brief/output template, so it is not fully copy-paste ready. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The five numbered steps are clearly sequenced, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops, which the top anchor requires even though the task is read-only. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external references, and is organized into clear sections (Relevant Actions, Workflow, Output Conventions), satisfying the simple-skill allowance for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |