Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured routing skill that defers detail to real one-level-deep reference files with a clear task-to-reference map and explicit validation checkpoints. Main weakness is conciseness: some sections repeat rules already stated elsewhere and carry meta-commentary that could be trimmed.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the .xlsx-don't-cite rule (stated in both 'Default Routing' rule 2 and 'Final Answer Requirement') and reconcile 'Required Read Order' with the 'Task To Reference Map' to remove overlapping guidance.
Trim meta-commentary in 'Canonical Workflow Bias' to the concrete preferred sequence; drop philosophical lines like 'Do not let accumulated edge-case guardrails turn a straightforward Sheets task into a long blocker-analysis exercise.'
Add one explicit error-recovery feedback loop inline (e.g., what to do when the post-import verification finds broken validation/chips) so workflow_clarity can reach 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient routing logic with no concept-explanation padding, but includes repetition ('Final Answer Requirement' restates Default Routing rule 2; 'Required Read Order' overlaps the 'Task To Reference Map') and meta-commentary ('Canonical Workflow Bias') that could be tightened, matching the score-3 anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete routing decisions, specific reference-file targets, named plugin URIs, and exact knobs like 'upload_mode: native_google_sheets' give mostly executable guidance; the actual command shapes live in references, leaving only minor gaps, matching the score-4 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequenced workflow (Canonical Workflow Bias steps 1-6) plus a Connector Load Checklist and explicit checkpoints (verify output spreadsheet ID differs, re-read before writing, verify clean/native/scannable) are present; explicit error-recovery feedback loops are largely delegated to references rather than inlined, matching the score-4 anchor and avoiding the batch/destructive cap at 3 since validation is present. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a routing overview with a clear 'Task To Reference Map' table and well-signaled, one-level-deep references; all referenced files exist in references/ (verified), content is appropriately split with details in references, matching the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |