Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-structured routing-and-tool skill: a numbered workflow with explicit confirmation and polling checkpoints for writes, concrete tool names, realistic example prompts, and clearly separated negative cases. No bundle files are needed and none are missing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and never explains concepts Claude already knows; it assumes competence and each section (Workflow, Good Fits, Negative Cases, Safety) earns its place. Minor routing-rule repetition across the opening, step 1, and Negative Cases is reinforcing rather than padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Names concrete, callable tools — search_projects, get_thread, create_thread, continue_thread — with the connector link, plus concrete example prompts in Good Fits. Guidance is specific and copy-paste usable rather than abstract. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly numbered 5-step sequence with an explicit write checkpoint: 'tell the user what prompt will be sent... ask for confirmation' and a feedback loop of polling get_thread 'until the thread is complete'. Write operations are not left ungated. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A compact single-file skill with no need for external references; content is organized into well-signaled sections (Workflow, Good Fits, Negative Cases, Safety), satisfying the simple-skill allowance for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |