ib-deck

Generate an institutional-grade investment banking pitch deck (HTML)

Quality

72%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/daloopa/skills/ib-deck/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a well-structured, lean, and actionable five-phase workflow that appropriately delegates detail to real one-level reference files. Its main gap is the absence of explicit validation checkpoints during batch data gathering and before final HTML output.

Suggestions

Add an explicit validation checkpoint after Phase 2 (Data Gathering), e.g. verify all required financials, peers, and market data are present before proceeding to analysis.

Add a build/output verification step in Phase 4 or 5, e.g. confirm every slide has 2–3 data-rich elements and all figures carry Daloopa citations before declaring the deck ready.

Consider a short 'verify completeness' checklist before Phase 5 output so missing citations or sparse slides are caught before delivery.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and concrete — phases, numbered slide lists, an inline DCF formula, and specific tool/format guidance — without explaining concepts Claude already knows, fitting the 'Lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence' anchor.	3 / 3
Actionability	Provides concrete executable guidance — the DCF formula (UFCF = NOPAT + D&A - CapEx - ΔWC), named tools (discover_companies, Daloopa MCP), exact CSS specs (1280×720, @page landscape, page-break-after), and a citation format — actionable for an instruction-only skill rather than vague direction.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The five phases are clearly sequenced, but for batch data gathering and HTML generation there is no explicit validation/verification checkpoint (e.g., confirm data completeness before building), which per the rubric caps workflow clarity at 2.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The body is an overview that clearly signals one-level-deep references to real bundle files — references/slide-templates.md, references/financial-components.md, references/ib-advisory-patterns.md — matching the 'Clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references' anchor.	3 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly conveys a specialized domain and is distinct from other skills, but it is single-action and omits an explicit 'Use when…' trigger clause. Adding trigger guidance and a few more concrete actions would lift specificity and completeness.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when…' clause, e.g. 'Use when the user asks for an investment banking pitch deck, sell-side presentation, M&A pitch, or fairness opinion deck.'

List a couple more concrete actions to improve specificity, e.g. 'Build an institutional-grade investment banking pitch deck (HTML) with valuation analysis, comps tables, and DCF detail.'

Include common user phrasings like 'presentation', 'M&A pitch', or 'sell-side deck' as trigger terms.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Quotes 'Generate an institutional-grade investment banking pitch deck (HTML)' — names the domain and a single action but does not list multiple concrete actions, matching the 'Names domain and some actions, but not comprehensive' anchor rather than the 'Lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor at 3.	2 / 3
Completeness	It states what the skill does (generate a pitch deck) but provides no 'Use when…' clause or explicit trigger guidance; per the rubric guideline, a missing trigger clause caps completeness at 2.	2 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Natural terms like 'investment banking pitch deck' and 'pitch deck' are present, but common variations a user might say ('presentation', 'sell-side', 'M&A pitch', 'decks') are missing, fitting the 'Some relevant keywords but missing common variations' anchor.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	'Institutional-grade investment banking pitch deck' is a clear, specialized niche with distinct triggers unlikely to overlap with other skills, matching the 'Clear niche with distinct triggers; unlikely to conflict' anchor.	3 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: openai/plugins
Path: plugins/daloopa/skills/ib-deck/SKILL.md
Commit: 11c74d6

Reviewed: 17 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.