CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

launch-readiness-orchestrator

Launch Readiness Orchestrator skill for Datasite deal rooms. Use this skill whenever a deal team wants a single pre-go-live readiness check across their data room — combining gap analysis, document quality audit, and risk review into one consolidated "is the room ready?" view. Triggers include: "are we ready to go live", "launch readiness check", "pre-launch audit", "data room readiness", "can we launch", "is the data room ready", "run a full readiness check", "go-live checklist", "pre-launch checklist", or any request to get a single overall assessment before opening the data room to buyers. Use proactively whenever a deal team is approaching their go-live date and wants a structured sign-off view. Do not use other individual audit skills (gap-analysis, document-quality-check, risk-analysis-audit) when this skill is active — this skill orchestrates all three in one pass.

72

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A highly actionable, well-sequenced orchestrator skill with concrete tooling, thresholds, and a complete deliverable template; its main weakness is length and repetition of the severity scale, plus no use of external reference files to offload the large report template.

Suggestions

Define the 🔴/🟡/🟢 severity scale once (e.g. in a short 'Severity ratings' section) and reference it from Steps 3, 4, and 5 instead of restating it each time.

Move the full Step 6 report template into a referenced file (e.g. report-template.md) and keep only the section outline inline, to reduce SKILL.md length and improve progressive disclosure.

Consider extracting the eight-row risk-categories table into a reference file so the core workflow stays lean while the domain detail remains discoverable.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is operational and domain-specific rather than padded with concepts Claude already knows, but the 🔴/🟡/🟢 severity scale is defined three separate times across Steps 3–5 and the full report template is long; both could be tightened by defining once and referencing.

2 / 3

Actionability

Concrete tool calls (getProjectOverview, listFolderContents, searchDocuments) with explicit parameters (depth: 5, foldersOnly: true), numeric thresholds (Finance ≥3 docs/yr, Legal ≥5), literal search strings ('enter password'), and a complete copy-paste report template.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clear six-step sequence with explicit checkpoints — the Blueflame activation gate ('Do not generate the report until after the user responds'), skip-and-note behavior when inactive, and error-recovery guidance to resume from the last completed step.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist; the skill is a single well-sectioned document with no nested references, but the full report template and the detailed risk-categories table are inline content that could be externalized into reference files for a skill of this length.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific description that clearly states the skill's three-workstream purpose, gives extensive natural trigger terms, and explicitly resolves conflict with sibling audit skills. Both the 'what' and 'when' are unambiguous.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'combining gap analysis, document quality audit, and risk review into one consolidated "is the room ready?" view' — rather than vague language.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (gap analysis + document quality audit + risk review consolidated view) and when ('Use this skill whenever…' plus an explicit trigger list and a proactive-use clause).

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Natural phrases a deal team would say are well covered: 'are we ready to go live', 'launch readiness check', 'pre-launch audit', 'can we launch', 'go-live checklist'.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear Datasite deal-room niche with distinct triggers, and it actively disambiguates from siblings: 'Do not use other individual audit skills (gap-analysis, document-quality-check, risk-analysis-audit) when this skill is active.'

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
openai/plugins
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.