Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, lean instruction-only skill: every section gives specific, actionable API guidance organized under clear headers, with an explicit workflow and validation checklist. The main gaps are the complete absence of code examples and a missing error-recovery loop after the validation step.
Suggestions
Add a few one-line code snippets for the most common cases (e.g., `Text(…).glassEffect(.regular.interactive())`, `GlassEffectContainer { … }`, `ToolbarSpacer(.fixed)`) so the highest-frequency guidance is copy-paste ready.
Extend workflow step 5 with an error-recovery branch: what to re-check and revert when visual validation fails (e.g., stray custom background layers, missing GlassEffectContainer) so the validation step closes the loop.
Consider moving the per-topic detail in Search and Controls into short reference files (e.g., references/controls.md) to keep SKILL.md as a tighter overview, if the skill grows further.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Efficient, directive bullets that add real value (new-API details like glassEffect, ToolbarSpacer, GlassEffectContainer, scrollEdgeEffectStyle that Claude will not already know), with no teaching of known concepts. Minor instances of trimmable rationale ("This is a visual correctness rule, not just organization:…") keep it below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance throughout — named modifiers with when-to-use conditions ("Use `ToolbarSpacer` to communicate grouping", "Wrap nearby custom glass elements in one `GlassEffectContainer`"). It stops short of anchor 5 because there are no code snippets at all; even one-line SwiftUI examples (e.g., `.glassEffect(.regular.interactive())`) would make the common cases copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step numbered sequence with an explicit validation step (step 5: "Validate that glass grouping, transitions, icon treatment, and foreground activation are visually coherent and still usable") plus a dedicated Review Checklist. It falls short of anchor 5 only because there is no error-recovery feedback loop (what to do when validation fails). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file skill with clear sections and a useful "When To Use Other Skills" navigation block; no bundle files exist, so there are no broken or nested references. At ~165 lines it exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill case, and some per-topic detail (search/controls) could live in reference files, placing it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |