Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary orchestrator document: it stays lean, gives concrete read-order and build-order guidance with explicit non-negotiables, and defers all implementation detail to a well-organized, verified one-level-deep reference bundle. Its only weaknesses are mild redundancy between the Read Order and the Focused Reference Families listing, and validation steps that are pointed to rather than stated inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: it assumes Claude's knowledge of USD, rendering, and UI concepts, and spends tokens only on routing rules ("Start by classifying the requested viewer, then read only the references needed"). The "Focused Reference Families" section re-lists ~40 paths already surfaced by the Read Order and routing.md, which is trimmable redundancy — matching anchor 4 ("efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed") rather than anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable routing directives throughout: exact paths ("Read `references/routing.md` to choose the delivery path"), explicit build order ("Implement the core render path first, then input routing and camera, then selection and data panels"), specific prohibitions ("Do not substitute WebGL, Three.js, Babylon.js..."), and two worked Examples. Per the rubric's code-vs-instruction note, absence of code is not penalized for this instruction-only router; it falls just short of anchor 5 because implementation detail is delegated to the references rather than covered in-file. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear multi-step sequence exists ("classify the requested viewer, then read only the references needed... Implement the render path first, layer interaction and UI behavior on top of it, and finish by capturing validation evidence"), backed by a six-step Build Workflow and a Completion Checklist. Validation is present but as a pointer ("Capture validation evidence before calling the viewer ready" via `references/validation.md`) rather than an in-file checkpoint command, so anchor 4 ("most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps") fits better than anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Verified against the actual bundle: every path cited in the body (routing.md, conventions.md, validation.md, and 40+ `references/<family>/README.md` files) exists, and all references are one level deep from SKILL.md. The body is a pure overview with a dedicated routing reference, conventionally grouped families, and read-order guidance — matching anchor 5 ("clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references; easy navigation"). | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |