Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured routing guide with concrete error codes, an explicit escalation checkpoint, and a clearly signaled single reference file. Slight gains are available from tightening the duplicated transport-failure framing and adding an example request.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated 'before any OpenAI API response exists' phrasing in item 1 to reduce redundancy.
Add a minimal copy-paste example of one retried API request with sandbox_permissions=require_escalated to raise actionability.
Format the billing/limits URLs as markdown links for easier navigation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence, with no padding about what OpenAI or error codes mean; the only minor redundancy is item 1 restating the 'before any OpenAI API response exists' framing across several bullets. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete error codes (401, invalid_api_key, insufficient_quota, rate_limit_exceeded), a specific rerun directive (sandbox_permissions=require_escalated), and exact billing/limits URLs make guidance executable, with minor gaps (no example request). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered routing sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint (rerun the request with escalated access, then route from the concrete response) and a Rules section distinguishing edge cases like insufficient_quota vs ordinary 429; feedback loops are present but lightly structured. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into Routing, Rules, and References, with a single one-level-deep reference (references/evals.md, verified to exist) that is clearly signaled and described. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |