Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, fully executable specification: exact input fields, concrete request patterns, defined success/failure output shapes, and a real matching script. The only notable flaw is minor token redundancy between the 'Execution' example and the first request pattern.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, but the bash example under 'Execution' repeats the first 'Common PubChem pattern' verbatim and 'Operating rules'/'Execution behavior' overlap slightly — minor instances that could be trimmed, fitting the score-4 anchor rather than 'every token earns its place'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable copy-paste guidance: a complete `echo ... | python scripts/rest_request.py` command, exact required/optional field lists, and three concrete request patterns covering the common PubChem cases, matching the 'fully executable, covers common cases' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A simple single-purpose skill whose one action (stdin JSON object -> script -> compact records or error) is unambiguous, with documented failure output (`ok=false` with `error.code` and `error.message`) providing an explicit recovery signal; the simple-skill exception applies since these are read-only calls with no destructive or batch operations. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections and no need for external references (explicitly stated), and the single referenced bundle file `scripts/rest_request.py` exists and matches the documented stdin/field interface, fitting the simple-skill guideline for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |