Conciseness

The body avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but 'Operating principles' and 'Performance Notes' duplicate each other verbatim ('Don't over-flag', 'Calibrate to deal size using transactionValue', 'Run the targeted search queries / do not read every document'), which is unnecessary padding; it is mostly efficient but could be tightened, matching the level-2 anchor rather than the lean level-3 anchor.

Actionability

Guidance is concrete (named MCP tools, depth params, per-workstream checklists, exact web-search query format, severity thresholds, HTML hex codes), but the executable core of Pass 2 — the per-workstream search queries and risk-signal definitions — is deferred to references/workstream-queries.md and never actually present, leaving key detail incomplete; this fits 'some concrete guidance but incomplete' rather than the fully copy-paste-ready level-3 anchor.

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced multi-step process (Step 1 through Step 5) with explicit validation checkpoints — complete Pass 1 across all workstreams before Pass 2, attempt a searchDocuments call and gate on the activation link, do not generate the dashboard until the user responds — and a real feedback loop for ambiguous snippets, matching the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps' anchor.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is well-organized into clear sections with one-level references (not nested), but it repeatedly points to references/workstream-queries.md which does not exist in the bundle, so the offloaded detail is unreachable; structure is present but a load-bearing reference is broken, fitting the level-2 anchor over the sound level-3 anchor.

Specificity

Names multiple concrete actions — 'audit, review, or flag risks', 'analyse deal risk by workstream' — and enumerates the specific workstreams (Tax, Finance, Legal, HR, IP, Commercial, Regulatory, ESG), matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor rather than the level-2 'some actions' anchor.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (audit/review/flag risks across a data room by workstream) and when, with an explicit 'Use this skill whenever...' clause, trigger list, proactive guidance, and negative scope — satisfying the 'clearly answers both what AND when with explicit triggers' anchor; not capped at 2 because a 'Use when...' clause is present.

Trigger Term Quality

Provides natural phrasings a deal team would actually say ('run a risk audit', 'flag risks in the data room', 'what are the risks in this deal', 'what should we fix before launch'), giving good coverage rather than the sparse level-2 set.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (sell-side deal-room risk audit) with distinct triggers and explicit negative scoping ('Do not use for document quality issues... use document-quality-check', '... gap-analysis'), making conflict with adjacent skills unlikely rather than merely 'somewhat specific' at level 2.