Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers an exceptionally concrete, well-sequenced workflow with a genuine validation feedback loop — exactly what an operation-generation skill needs. Its main weakness is redundancy: the search/validate instructions are repeated across three sections and could be consolidated into one, which would cut tokens without losing compliance force.
Suggestions
Consolidate the 'Required Tool Calls' section and the two 'MANDATORY' sections into a single workflow section — the search and validate commands, their flags, and the retry rules are each stated two to three times.
Move the flag explanations (artifact-ID stability, revision incrementing) into one place next to the first command occurrence instead of repeating the parenthetical guidance in both sections.
Add a one-line note describing the bundle layout (search_docs.mjs for doc retrieval, validate.mjs for validation, assets/ vector store) so the skill's file structure is self-describing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 'Required Tool Calls' section, the two 'MANDATORY' sections, and the closing bold admonition ('You must run both search_docs.mjs and validate.mjs in every response') restate the same commands, flags, and retry rules two to three times. The content is mostly purposeful but could be tightened by consolidating the duplicated instructions into one place. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable commands with all instrumentation flags spelled out and explained ('scripts/validate.mjs --code ... --model YOUR_MODEL_NAME ... --artifact-id YOUR_ARTIFACT_ID --revision REVISION_NUMBER'), a concrete search example ('productCreate mutation'), and explicit artifact-ID/revision conventions. Copy-paste ready. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered 1-5 sequence (search → write → validate → retry loop → return only after passing) with an explicit validation checkpoint and a full feedback loop: read the exact error, search for the correct values, fix, re-validate, capped at 3 retries with a documented fallback. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-sectioned ~80-line workflow whose referenced bundle files (scripts/search_docs.mjs, scripts/validate.mjs) both exist; dynamic documentation is delegated to the search script rather than inlined, which is appropriate. Minor gap: no section explains the bundle layout (the assets vector store file is never mentioned), keeping it just short of the clear-overview anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |