Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, actionable, and token-efficient, with concrete fetch/evaluate/report instructions and a clear output template. The main gap is the absence of an explicit validation/feedback loop in the workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and task-specific, assuming Claude's knowledge (no preamble on what Shopify or compliance is), with only minor redundancy such as restating the 'when in doubt, use ⚠️' guidance in multiple places. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully concrete, executable guidance—an exact URL to fetch, precise three-status definitions with criteria, applicability-gating rules, and a detailed output template—leaving little ambiguity about what to do. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence is laid out (fetch requirements → evaluate each → gate by applicability → track skipped groups → compile report) with decision checkpoints, but it lacks an explicit validate/fix/retry feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections and appropriately externalizes the bulk content (the requirements list) to a single well-signaled live URL rather than inlining it; no bundle files exist to navigate. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |