Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a strong, well-validated workflow, but it pays for repeated command templates and mandatory-step restatements in conciseness, and it does not split deeper detail into referenced files. Tightening redundancy and externalizing reference material would lift both weaker dimensions.
Suggestions
State the search and validate commands once with their flags, then reference them by name in the mandatory-steps section instead of repeating the full command templates three times.
Move the generic "Think about all the steps..." checklist into a short reference file and link to it, improving both conciseness and progressive disclosure.
Trim redundant restatements of "you must run both scripts in every response" to a single authoritative instruction.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the search/validate command templates and the "mandatory" instructions are restated three times (Required Tool Calls, MANDATORY Search, MANDATORY Validate), which could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides exact executable commands with all required flags and a concrete example query ("customer orders query"), making the guidance copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The search → write → validate sequence is explicit, with a validation checkpoint and a search/fix/revalidate feedback loop capped at 3 retries, matching the level-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Referenced scripts (search_docs.mjs, validate.mjs) exist in the bundle, but all instructional content is inline with no signaled one-level-deep reference docs, so navigation is not well structured. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |