Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured overview that exemplifies progressive disclosure, keeping the body lean and delegating detailed SQL examples to one-level-deep reference files. The main weakness is that the body itself carries no executable code, relying entirely on referenced files for actionable guidance.
Suggestions
Inline 1-2 short, high-impact SQL examples (e.g. adding an index on a WHERE column) so the body is immediately actionable without requiring a file read for the most common case.
Add a brief 'Quick check' workflow step (e.g. run EXPLAIN ANALYZE before/after) so the usage sequence has an explicit verification checkpoint for optimization tasks.
Reduce the minor redundancy between the opening paragraph and the 'When to Apply' section by merging or trimming one of them.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean overview/index with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; only minor redundancy between the intro and the 'When to Apply' list could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete priority table with category prefixes and impact levels, but the body itself contains no executable SQL or code — all actionable examples live in the referenced files. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The lookup workflow (identify category by prefix/impact, read the corresponding rule file, apply its incorrect-vs-correct structure) is clear; this is a reference guide rather than a destructive operation, so the validation cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview in SKILL.md pointing to well-signaled, one-level-deep reference files (verified present, e.g. references/query-missing-indexes.md, references/_sections.md) with an organized category table for easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |