Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, token-efficient index that leverages progressive disclosure across a large reference bundle. Its weaknesses are the absence of executable content or validation guidance in the body itself and a broken example reference path.
Suggestions
Fix the broken reference in the 'How to Use' example block: references/schema-partial-indexes.md does not exist — the actual file is references/query-partial-indexes.md.
Add a brief validation checkpoint to the workflow (e.g., 'After applying a rule, re-run EXPLAIN ANALYZE or the relevant diagnostic to confirm the improvement') since the skill guides schema and configuration changes that can be destructive.
Either inline one concrete executable example (e.g., a representative index-creation snippet) or make the navigation more actionable by listing the per-category rule files so Claude can locate guidance without guessing filenames.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient — a short overview, a 'When to Apply' bullet list, a priority table, and a 'How to Use' section — with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is mostly high-level ('Read individual rule files for detailed explanations and SQL examples') with concrete file paths and a description of each file's structure, but no executable SQL or commands in the body, and one example path (references/schema-partial-indexes.md) does not exist, leaving key details incomplete. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A rough navigation sequence is present (identify category by prefix → read the matching rule file → apply its incorrect/correct examples), but there are no validation or verification checkpoints, which is a gap for a skill that guides potentially destructive schema and configuration changes. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure: a concise overview, a prefix/category table for discovery, and clearly signaled one-level-deep references to 33 rule files. Minor gaps — the 'How to Use' example block shows only 3 of 33 files and includes a non-existent path (schema-partial-indexes.md). | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |