Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured skill body: an unambiguous five-step workflow, useful guardrails against Xcode-assumption errors, and explicit output expectations, all with essentially zero token waste. The only refinement would be supplying exact flag syntax for test filtering and release builds and an explicit build-success checkpoint before running.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~45-line body is lean and imperative throughout ("Read `Package.swift`", "Use `swift build` by default") with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete executable commands are given (`swift build`, `swift run <product>`, `swift test`) with decision rules, but a few spots stop short of copy-paste-ready syntax — "Apply filters when a specific test target or case is known" omits the `--filter` flag, and release mode is named without its command — so it matches 'mostly executable guidance; minor gaps' rather than fully executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five steps (inspect → build → run → test → summarize failures) are clearly sequenced with decision points (release mode, multiple executables), but validation checkpoints such as confirming the build succeeded before running are implicit rather than explicit, matching 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external references, and its content is organized into clear, well-labeled sections (Quick Start, Workflow, Guardrails, Output Expectations), which per the simple-skill guideline earns the top progressive-disclosure score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |