Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is token-efficient, highly actionable with named tools and a concrete formatting template, and structured into well-signaled sections with an upfront scope-confirmation checkpoint. Progressive disclosure is clean with a single shallow external reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: it does not explain what Teams is or how the tools work, and every section (Start Here, Workflow, Formatting) earns its place without padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It names concrete tools (resolve_team, list_channel_messages, list_recent_threads) and provides a literal, copy-paste-ready digest template with explicit gating rules for each optional section. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered Workflow gives a clear sequence, and the Start Here gate ('ask first before making Teams tool calls') plus the scope-confirmation step 1 act as an explicit checkpoint before any risky calls. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is organized into clearly signaled sections with one one-level-deep external reference (the Planner skill table); no bundle files exist to verify, and nothing is monolithic or deeply nested. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |