Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-structured instruction-only skill with a clear sequenced workflow and explicit safety checkpoints for destructive operations. The only gap is actionability: guidance is specific and operation-named but lacks any executable or copy-paste-ready artifacts.
Suggestions
Add one or two short, copy-paste-ready snippets or parameter signatures for the most common operations (e.g. an example `create_planner_task` invocation with its fields) to lift actionability to fully executable.
Include a brief inline example of a proposal payload (title, assignee, due date, target bucket) so the Output Conventions section doubles as a concrete template.
Clarify how a follow-up becomes a task by showing the extracted-action-item to task-field mapping rather than only describing it in prose.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and well-organized with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section and line earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, operation-specific guidance names exact tools in backticks (e.g. `list_planner_tasks`, `update_planner_task`), but it is instruction-only with no executable code or copy-paste artifacts, so it is not fully copy-paste ready. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit safety/validation checkpoints for destructive and batch operations (resolve targets before delete/update, restate target, fetch current state first). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single self-contained, well-organized SKILL.md under 50 lines with no need for external references; sections are clear and easy to navigate. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |