Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, token-efficient triage skill with concrete commands and a clear sequenced workflow. The main improvement opportunity is making the runnable commands more copy-paste-ready with explicit flags or focused-rerun examples.
Suggestions
Add a concrete focused-rerun example (e.g. `xcodebuild test -only-testing:TestTarget/ClassName/testMethod` or `swift test --filter TestClass.testMethod`) so the 'Rerun intelligently' step is copy-paste ready.
Show one or two example command invocations with common flags (scheme/destination for xcodebuild) to lift actionability from concrete hints to executable guidance.
Add an explicit re-confirmation checkpoint after a fix (e.g. 'rerun the focused scope and confirm it passes before widening scope') to close the workflow_clarity validation gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout: a short Quick Start and a tightly scoped 5-step workflow with no explaining of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete commands ("xcodebuild test", "swift test") and a precise failure taxonomy, but stops short of copy-paste-ready invocations or flag examples covering common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear, well-sequenced 5-step process with the classification step acting as a checkpoint and "Rerun intelligently" providing feedback guidance; minor validation gaps (no explicit fix-then-reconfirm loop) keep it below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no external references, and cleanly organized into Quick Start, Workflow, Guardrails, and Output Expectations sections — meeting the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |