CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

twilio-customer-support-architect

Planning skill for building customer service and support systems. Qualifies the developer's needs across the support ladder (self-service → AI agents → contact center), channel mix, and scale to recommend the right Twilio architecture. Handles both "build me a call center" and "add an IVR to my existing support line."

57

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Medium

Suggest reviewing before use

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/twilio-developer-kit/skills/twilio-customer-support-architect/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, highly actionable discovery framework that front-loads the right non-obvious Twilio domain knowledge, held back mainly by verbatim duplication of the Functions-scaling and Conference points and by inlining reference-grade compliance/gotcha material.

Suggestions

De-duplicate the Functions scaling/thin-receiver content and the 'every call should be a Conference' guidance so each appears once (canonicalize in Decision Rules and reference from Step 4).

Consider extracting the compliance reference (TCPA/PCI/HIPAA/FDCPA/GDPR/SHAKEN-STIR) and the gotchas lists into a references/ file, keeping SKILL.md as the decision overview.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense with genuinely non-obvious Twilio/domain knowledge (TaskRouter gotchas, compliance regimes, Functions limits), but several points are duplicated verbatim — the 30-concurrent/10s-timeout thin-receiver pattern appears in both Step 4 and Decision Rules, and the 'every call should be a Conference' guidance repeats — so it could be tightened.

3 / 5

Actionability

Highly concrete for a planning skill: six specific qualifying questions with branching answers, named TwiML verbs/verbs, explicit product-skill install lists, and a copy-paste Output Format template, with only minor gaps.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear, ordered sequence (mode detection → 6 questions → support ladder → context → output) with explicit decision rules; this is advisory discovery rather than a destructive/batch pipeline, so the validation-cap rule does not apply, though explicit error-recovery feedback loops are absent.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist, so the skill is a single well-sectioned file (Role, Triggers, Steps 1–4, Decision Rules, Output Format) with clearly signaled cross-references to sibling skills; the main gap is that reference-y material (compliance details, gotchas) is inlined rather than split into reference files.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A specific, well-targeted discovery-skill description with strong trigger terms and a distinct niche, weakened only by the absence of an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming concrete trigger phrases (e.g., 'Use when a developer asks to build a call center, IVR, help desk, or contact center') to lift completeness above 3.

Surface a few more natural synonyms in the description itself (help desk, phone tree, call routing) rather than only in the body, to broaden trigger coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (customer service/support systems, Twilio) and several concrete actions — 'Qualifies the developer's needs across the support ladder, channel mix, and scale to recommend the right Twilio architecture' — with only minor coverage gaps.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear (planning skill that qualifies needs and recommends architecture), but there is no explicit 'Use when...' clause; the 'when' is only weakly implied via the two quoted example phrases, so completeness is capped at 3 per the missing-trigger-clause guideline.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural trigger phrases users would say — 'customer service and support systems', 'contact center', 'call center', 'IVR', 'support line' — though a few common synonyms (help desk, phone tree, call routing) appear only in the body, not the description.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It carves a clear niche (Twilio customer-support architecture discovery) with distinct triggers, though it explicitly hands off to sibling architect skills, creating minor overlap risk with closely related planners.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
openai/plugins
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.