Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured with a clear decision flowchart and properly signaled one-level-deep reference files, but it carries repetitive emphatic padding and relies on fuzzy judgment-based checkpoints rather than concrete, fully deterministic guidance.
Suggestions
Trim the EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT block and condense the 13-row red-flags table to the few highest-value patterns to improve token efficiency.
Tighten the core rule from the fuzzy 'even a 1% chance' heuristic into a concrete, verifiable check (e.g., list the task categories that always require a skill check).
Add an explicit verification checkpoint in the flow (e.g., 'confirm the invoked skill's checklist is complete before responding') to make the workflow's control points concrete rather than judgment-based.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Most content is efficient procedural guidance (tool names, priority order, a flowchart), but the emphatic EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT block ("This is not negotiable. This is not optional. You cannot rationalize your way out of this.") and the 13-row red-flags table are repetitive reinforcement that could be tightened. It does not explain basic concepts Claude already knows (so not 1), but the padding keeps it below the lean score-3 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete guidance (specific tool names across platforms, the announcement template 'Using [skill] to [purpose]', 'Create TodoWrite todo per item', and a decision flowchart), but the core rule is a fuzzy judgment call ('even a 1% chance a skill might apply') and much of the body lists anti-patterns to avoid rather than executable steps. It is well above vague/abstract (so not 1) but not fully deterministic/copy-paste ready (so not 3). | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The graphviz flowchart gives a clear sequenced process with explicit decision diamonds (Might any skill apply? Has checklist? Already brainstormed?) and a skill-priority order. However the checkpoints are judgment-based ('might any skill apply?') rather than concrete verifiable validation, and there is no explicit verify/feedback loop; this is not a destructive/batch operation so the score-2 cap does not force it down, but it still stops short of the explicit-validation score-3 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is organized into clear labeled sections and properly offloads platform tool mappings to one-level-deep, clearly signaled references ("see references/copilot-tools.md (Copilot CLI), references/codex-tools.md (Codex)"), all of which exist. Content is appropriately split and navigation is easy, matching the score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |