Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, executable, and concise workflow skill with clear sequencing, explicit validation/feedback checkpoints, and clean section organization throughout.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains git/PR concepts Claude already knows and uses terse bullets and concrete commands, so every token earns its place. There is minor overlap between the Overview hybrid bullets and step 7, but not enough to drop it to the 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' level. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands are given throughout — `git status -sb`, `git push -u origin $(git branch --show-current)`, `gh auth status`, `gh pr create --draft --fill --head $(git branch --show-current)` — matching the 'fully executable code/commands' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | An explicit 8-step sequence with validation checkpoints (auth check, pre-stage diff inspection, run checks) and a retry feedback loop (step 5: checks fail → install deps → rerun once), plus the Write Safety guardrails for the destructive push/commit operations. It is not a 2 because validation and feedback loops are explicit rather than implicit. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is self-contained and organized into clear sections (Overview, Prerequisites, Naming conventions, Workflow, Write Safety, PR Body Expectations) with no need for external references; the only bundle files are two icon assets, not reference docs. Per the simple-skills scoring note, well-organized sections without external references warrant a 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |