CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

clawhub-moderation

Use for ClawHub staff moderation actions with the repo-local ClawHub admin tool: skills, users, org publishers, plugin packages, trusted publishers, official publishers, and guarded staff email.

72

Quality

87%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

High

Do not use without reviewing

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A lean, highly actionable admin-tool reference that assumes Claude's competence, sequences destructive operations with explicit confirmation and verification feedback loops, and stays well-organized in a single appropriately-scoped file.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is a dense operational command reference with no concept explanations Claude already knows and no padding; commands, flags, dry-run/apply patterns, and impact notes each earn their tokens.

3 / 3

Actionability

Every section gives fully executable 'bun run admin -- …' commands with concrete flags, real examples, and confirmation-token flows that are copy-paste ready rather than pseudocode.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Safety Rules sequence the operation (target → reason → confirm → write) with a dry-run-to-apply feedback loop, and a dedicated Verification section provides explicit post-write validation per resource for these destructive/batch operations.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No external references are needed and none are used; the single self-contained command map is clearly sectioned with headers (Safety Rules, Command Map, per-resource subsections, Verification, Impact Notes) for easy navigation, with no nested-reference depth.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

75%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A clear, well-scoped staff-moderation description with explicit trigger guidance and strong distinctiveness, weakened only by relying on a single generic action verb and some specialized jargon rather than enumerating concrete moderation actions.

Suggestions

Name concrete moderation actions (e.g., ban/unban users, hard-delete or unhide skills, transfer packages, send guarded staff email) instead of the single generic phrase 'moderation actions' to raise specificity.

Soften jargon or add natural synonyms (e.g., 'ban or restore users', 'delete or hide skills', 'transfer plugin ownership') so trigger terms match what staff would actually say.

Consider a 'Use when…' phrasing that names the triggering situations (e.g., resolving moderation reports, lifting holds, remediating autobans) to strengthen the when-side trigger.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description enumerates eight concrete target objects (skills, users, org publishers, plugin packages, trusted publishers, official publishers, guarded staff email) and names the tool, but the only action verb is the generic 'moderation actions' rather than distinct verbs like ban/delete/transfer.

2 / 3

Completeness

It explicitly states what the skill does (repo-local ClawHub admin tool acting on enumerated targets) and provides an explicit 'Use for…' trigger clause answering when to use it, so the cap-at-2 rule for missing trigger guidance does not apply.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

'Use for ClawHub staff moderation actions' is a natural trigger and terms like skills/users/plugin packages match staff phrasing, but 'trusted publishers', 'official publishers', and 'guarded staff email' are specialized jargon lacking common natural variations.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The product-specific (ClawHub), staff-only, tool-scoped niche with distinct moderation triggers makes it very unlikely to fire for an unrelated skill.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
openclaw/clawhub
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.