Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary compact skill body: a precisely sequenced workflow with built-in safety rails (never handle credentials, confirm before user-visible DNS changes, verify afterwards) and provider-specific commands. The only notable gap is the missing exact command for the Convex custom-domain attach step.
Suggestions
Give the exact attach command (e.g., the npx convex CLI invocation or the dashboard path) instead of '(dashboard or CLI)' in step 4.
Add one line on what to do when verification fails or DNS doesn't propagate (e.g., re-check records with dig, common CNAME flattening pitfalls).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence: it never explains what DNS or a CNAME record is, and packs each line with actionable specifics like 'flarectl dns create (note: wrangler itself doesn't manage DNS records)'. Every token earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor; it is not lower because no padded or explanatory passages exist. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance with copy-paste commands for five provider CLIs, read-only auth checks, and 'dig +short' verification — but step 4 says 'Attach the domain as a Convex custom domain (dashboard or CLI)' without the exact command, and record values are described as to-be-derived ('with concrete host/value strings, not placeholders'). Minor gaps keep it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six clearly sequenced steps with explicit validation checkpoints: read-only auth check first, user confirmation before running, 'Verify records landed with dig +short', 'wait for verification', and a final HTTPS check including the apex→www redirect. Because this workflow touches a live domain, validation presence is decisive — it is fully covered, matching the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps' anchor; not 4 because no checkpoint is missing. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, has no bundle files, and is cleanly organized into a Workflow section and a Rules section with no content that belongs in a separate file. Per the rubric's simple-skill note, well-organized sections alone warrant a 5 here. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |