Conciseness

The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence — it explains no general concepts and documents real tool limitations ('logs takes only a --history COUNT... there is NO server-side status/function/requestId/time filter'). It stops short of a 5 because the Rules section substantially restates workflow steps (no-server-filter, dashboard link, discover-first, and hand-off each appear twice), which could be trimmed.

Actionability

Concrete, executable guidance throughout: named tools with flags ('logs --history <n> --jsonl', 'insights', 'functionSpec', 'status'), a defined answer format (one-line finding + counts + first stack per group + deep link), and explicit client-side filtering steps. It misses a 5 because the dashboard deep link — a required part of every answer — is described only as 'build it from the deployment name + function' with no URL pattern to copy.

Workflow Clarity

Seven clearly sequenced steps with real checkpoints: a guard step (identify the deployment), discover-before-query discipline, three named views with when-to-use-each, a bounded-window rule, and a correlate-don't-assert cross-check. The skill is read-only so the destructive-cap does not apply, but there is no explicit feedback loop for error recovery (e.g., what to do when the window contains no failures or the function name isn't found), keeping it below the 5 anchor.

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines, single-purpose, and well organized with a Workflow section and a Rules section, which per the simple-skill note would support a 5. However, the body references paths and sibling skills outside this skill's bundle ('specs/finding.schema.json', 'deploy-guard step 0-1', 'convex-advisor', 'monitor/sentinel') with no references/ or scripts/ files present, leaving dangling navigation — a minor organization gap matching the 4 anchor.

Specificity

The description names the domain ('a running Convex app's logs + health') and lists several concrete capabilities — 'failures, slow/expensive functions, deploy causality' — which matches the anchor for several specific actions with minor gaps in coverage. It falls short of the 5 anchor because the actions are compressed into fragments rather than a comprehensive, plainly stated list.

Completeness

The 'what' is clear (query a running Convex app's logs and health in natural language), but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance; the 'when' is only weakly implied by 'a running Convex app'. Per the judging guidelines, a missing 'Use when...' clause caps completeness at 3.

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural keyword coverage: 'logs', 'failures', 'slow', 'health', 'deploy' are phrases users would say when they need this. It stays at 4 rather than 5 because common variations like 'errors', 'debug', 'production', or 'why did my deploy break this' are absent, and phrases like 'deploy causality' and 'evidence-backed' are jargon users would not naturally say.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It occupies a clear niche (Convex log/health querying via the official MCP) with distinct Convex-specific triggers, but 'slow/expensive functions' overlaps the territory of a closely related perf/advisor skill, creating minor overlap risk — matching the 'mostly distinct' anchor rather than the minimal-conflict anchor at 5.