Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of token-efficient, actionable instruction for a monitoring skill: one concrete tool call, a typed event-dispatch table, and fallback rules. The only weaknesses are an unenumerated event_kinds enum and the dangling "(see sentinel)" pointer.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | At roughly 25 lines the body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — the intro sentence, a 3-step workflow, and 3 rules with no padding and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives a concrete tool call with its parameter object ("Call `wait_for_event` with {project_dir, event_kinds, timeout_ms}") and a typed dispatch table per event kind; minor gaps: the valid `event_kinds` values are never enumerated, and "triage (see sentinel)" points to something not resolvable from this skill. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 3-step sequence is clear with per-kind dispatch branches and a documented fallback mechanism; the loop-back after handling a non-quiet event is only implied by "On kind=quiet: loop" rather than stated explicitly, and no other validation checkpoints exist (none needed for this non-destructive monitoring task). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no bundle files and no need for external references, organized into a clean Workflow/Rules structure; the "(see sentinel)" pointer is not a clearly signaled or navigable reference, which is a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |