Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: a dense one-line detector mapping ('email/SMTP → resend; push notifications → expo-push; setInterval/cron → @convex-dev/crons; ...'), terse rules, and one earned example quote. No padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching anchor 5 ('every token earns its place').

Actionability

Guidance is mostly executable for an instruction-only skill: exact pattern-to-component mappings, a concrete command ('run `/add <component>`'), a model citation example, and rules for decline/ignore. The gap versus anchor 5 is that step 4 defers to 'follow the installHint from the detector', whose contents are not provided anywhere in the skill, leaving a missing detail for execution.

Workflow Clarity

The 5-step workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit branch handling for both outcomes ('If the user says yes: run /add...' / 'If the user says no or ignores it: drop it. Do not repeat.') and a strict passive-timing rule (suggest only after the current task). This is a simple single-purpose skill with an unambiguous sequence and no destructive/batch operations, so it meets the simple-skill exception for a 5.

Progressive Disclosure

The ~24-line body is well organized into Workflow and Rules sections, which alone would merit a 5 under the under-50-line simple-skill exception (no external references needed). However, it points to 'generators/suggest-detector.mjs' and its 'installHint' — a file that does not exist in this bundle — a dangling reference that is a minor organization/navigation gap, fitting anchor 4.

Specificity

The description gives one concrete action ('Suggest the matching Convex component') plus an enumerated trigger list ('crons, sharded-counter, rate-limiter, storage, search, presence, workflow, RAG, prosemirror-sync'), matching the anchor 'names domain and 1-2 concrete actions, but not comprehensive'. It does not list several distinct actions (suggest, install, configure), so anchor 4's 'several specific actions' is not met.

Completeness

Both parts are explicit: what — 'Suggest the matching Convex component'; when — 'when the user hand-rolls a pattern it already solves (crons, sharded-counter, rate-limiter, storage, search, presence, workflow, RAG, prosemirror-sync)'. This matches anchor 5: clearly answers both what AND when with concrete trigger phrases, so anchor 4 ('when could be more explicit') does not fit.

Trigger Term Quality

Keywords present ('crons', 'rate-limiter', 'storage', 'search', 'presence', 'workflow', 'RAG') are solution-side component names rather than the natural phrases a user hand-rolling these patterns would say ('cron job', 'setInterval', 'push notifications', 'file uploads'). This fits anchor 3's 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms' rather than anchor 4's good natural-term coverage.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is unambiguous — passively suggesting Convex components for hand-rolled duplicate patterns — with behavior boundaries stated ('Passive — suggest after the task, never interrupt', 'Never install without consent'), giving minimal conflict risk with other skills as in anchor 5.