CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

gog-chat

Google Chat operations through gog.

58

Quality

67%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.agents/skills/gog-chat/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a tight, well-structured CLI wrapper that defers shared rules to a sibling skill and provides concrete safe-start commands and safety checkpoints. The only meaningful gap is the absence of a worked example for a concrete chat operation.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is extremely lean: it assumes Claude knows what Google Chat is, delegates shared rules to ../gog/SKILL.md, and every line is actionable with no padding. This matches 'Lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence; every token earns its place'.

5 / 5

Actionability

Copy-paste-ready commands ('gog auth list --check --json --no-input', the commands table) and concrete flag guidance are provided, but no example invocation of an actual chat operation (e.g. sending a DM or listing spaces) is shown, leaving a minor gap. It is above 3 because the safe-start commands are fully executable, and below 5 because the common operations themselves lack worked examples.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear safe-start sequence and explicit safety checkpoints ('Confirm the exact account, object, and mutation before any write or delete', '--dry-run before supported writes', '--readonly') are present, so the destructive-operation cap at 3 does not apply. It is below 5 because there is no explicit validate-fix-retry feedback loop.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

This is a sub-50-line skill with well-organized sections (Safe start, Commands) and a single clearly-signaled one-level-deep reference ('Read ../gog/SKILL.md first for shared auth, output, safety, and live-write rules'), matching the simple-skill exception for a score of 5.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

48%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description correctly identifies the domain and tool but is too terse: 'operations' is generic and there is no 'Use when' trigger guidance. It is distinct but under-specifies concrete capabilities and the situations that should activate it.

Suggestions

Replace the generic word 'operations' with 2-3 concrete actions, e.g. 'Send and read Google Chat messages, manage spaces and threads through gog.'

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when the user asks to send or read Google Chat messages, list or manage Chat spaces and threads.'

Include natural synonyms users say ('Google Chat', 'chat messages', 'DMs', 'spaces', 'threads') to improve trigger term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The phrase 'Google Chat operations through gog' names the domain and tool but 'operations' is generic with no concrete actions enumerated, matching the anchor 'Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic'. It is not a 1 because a concrete domain and tool are named, and not a 3 because no specific actions (e.g. send messages, list spaces) are listed.

2 / 5

Completeness

A 'what' is present (Google Chat operations via the gog tool) but there is no 'Use when...' trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the rubric. It is above 2 because the what is identifiable rather than extremely vague, and below 4 because no 'when' clause exists at all.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

'Google Chat' is a relevant natural keyword a user would say, but common variations and synonyms (chat, messaging, DM, spaces, threads) are absent, matching 'Some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms'. It is above 2 because 'Google Chat' is a specific natural phrase rather than a generic keyword, but below 4 due to the missing synonyms.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Naming both the specific product 'Google Chat' and the specific tool 'gog' gives a clear niche with only minor overlap risk against sibling gog skills (e.g. gog-mail, gog-drive). It is not a 5 because 'operations' lacks the distinct trigger phrases that would fully minimize conflict risk.

4 / 5

Total

12

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 1 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
openclaw/gogcli
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.